Coincidentally with my own two posts Richard Carrier has been posting on two other reactions to the widening interest in questions about the historicity of Jesus. He takes the trouble to respond to James McGrath’s typically dishonest nonsense (this time against Raphael Lataster’s new book), and to respond point by point to John Tors’ reaction to Brian Bethune’s Macleans’ article.
.
On Stanley Porter’s reaction: Biblical Scholars Reacting to Public Interest in Mythicism: Part 1
On Philip Jenkins’ reaction: Biblical Scholars Reacting . . . Part 2
Neil Godfrey
Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)
- Messiah Mode – understanding Israel today - 2024-03-27 00:00:46 GMT+0000
- Before “Biblical Israel” there was Yahweh - 2024-03-26 00:00:27 GMT+0000
- Responding to a Critic of the Hellenistic Era Hypothesis for the Hebrew Bible - 2024-03-25 00:00:06 GMT+0000
If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!